Category: Volume 19 Issue 3

Volume 19, Issue 3

Sometimes as an editor you receive a contribution that challenges you and the way you see the world. Jim Killaly’s ‘Fair Game’ does that. It is a ground-breaking work, distilled from 40 years of administering and thinking about the tax system and the deeper drivers that underpin the very human actions and interactions in this area.

Killaly spent 46 years in the Australian Tax Office. He was a well-respected and, for some taxpayers and non-taxpayers, a feared Deputy Commissioner. It is the lived experience of tax administration that has inspired Jim to write this analysis. As a tax researcher, the search for deeper meaning and understanding is one I am familiar with
too and there is so much in this work that provokes and challenges the old ways of viewing tax and thinking about it.

Killaly uses a systemic framework analysis to give a deeper level of understanding, from the big picture down to specific cases. This framework is made up of the “Iceberg Model”, mapping of the economic value chains of multinational groups, economic functional analysis and productivity analysis. His aim, as he says in the overview, is ‘… to show that for each of these levels and contexts the framework enables policymakers, tax administrators and tax professionals to better understand and manage the complexity of issues that are arising.’ Killaly concentrates on companies and tax, in particular cross-border situations, to explore the complexity of arrangements and potential resolution of the problems that arise. The identification of underlying movements coming out of this more systemic approach gives us the basic tools to do that. As he says:

The proposed methodology includes a distillation of the patterns and trends in the stocks and flows of transactions and events (and the patterns and trends in relation to the absence of desirable transactions, stocks, flows and events) for deeper analysis of the underlying causes and their impacts.

The approach involves understanding that tax is part of a wider system that includes competitive markets, the global economy, the Australian economy and its performance, the growing oligopolisation of capital, the impact of companies as groups both within Australia and across the globe, and how the Australian company tax system operates both on paper and in practice. Part of Killaly’s work involves applying his framework in specific situations such as corporate financing and transfer pricing. Not only that but the former Deputy Commissioner uses the framework to examine and judge the ATO’s administration of the 1,400 major economic groups. As to determining appropriate policy, administration or other actions in an ever changing world, Killaly says:

The analysis takes for granted that Australia will need to be responsive to emerging strategic issues on an ongoing basis. However, it explores whether the use of the systemic analysis tools in policymaking and tax administration might allow Australia to complement this responsiveness with a forward-looking approach that makes public policy more effective and sustainable.

I strongly recommend ‘Fair Game’ to all our readers.

John Passant, co-editor, the Journal of Australian Taxation, and former ATO colleague of Jim Killaly.

DOWNLOAD THE FULL ARTICLE

Comments Off on Volume 19, Issue 3 Posted in

JAT Volume 19 Issue 3 – Killaly

Sometimes as an editor you receive a contribution that challenges you and the way you see the world. Jim Killaly’s ‘Fair Game’ does that. It is a ground-breaking work, distilled from 40 years of administering and thinking about the tax system and the deeper drivers that underpin the very human actions and interactions in this area.

Killaly spent 46 years in the Australian Tax Office. He was a well-respected and, for some taxpayers and non-taxpayers, a feared Deputy Commissioner. It is the lived experience of tax administration that has inspired Jim to write this analysis. As a tax researcher, the search for deeper meaning and understanding is one I am familiar with
too and there is so much in this work that provokes and challenges the old ways of viewing tax and thinking about it.

Killaly uses a systemic framework analysis to give a deeper level of understanding, from the big picture down to specific cases. This framework is made up of the “Iceberg Model”, mapping of the economic value chains of multinational groups, economic functional analysis and productivity analysis. His aim, as he says in the overview, is ‘… to show that for each of these levels and contexts the framework enables policymakers, tax administrators and tax professionals to better understand and manage the complexity of issues that are arising.’ Killaly concentrates on companies and tax, in particular cross-border situations, to explore the complexity of arrangements and potential resolution of the problems that arise. The identification of underlying movements coming out of this more systemic approach gives us the basic tools to do that. As he says:

The proposed methodology includes a distillation of the patterns and trends in the stocks and flows
of transactions and events (and the patterns and trends in relation to the absence of desirable
transactions, stocks, flows and events) for deeper analysis of the underlying causes and their
impacts.

The approach involves understanding that tax is part of a wider system that includes competitive markets, the global economy, the Australian economy and its performance, the growing oligopolisation of capital, the impact of companies as groups both within Australia and across the globe, and how the Australian company tax system operates both on paper and in practice. Part of Killaly’s work involves applying his framework in specific situations such as corporate financing and transfer pricing. Not only that but the former Deputy Commissioner uses the framework to examine and judge the ATO’s administration of the 1,400 major economic groups. As to determining appropriate policy, administration or other actions in an ever changing world, Killaly says:

The analysis takes for granted that Australia will need to be responsive to emerging strategic issues
on an ongoing basis. However, it explores whether the use of the systemic analysis tools in
policymaking and tax administration might allow Australia to complement this responsiveness with a
forward-looking approach that makes public policy more effective and sustainable.

I strongly recommend ‘Fair Game’ to all our readers.

John Passant, co-editor, the Journal of Australian Taxation, and former ATO colleague of Jim Killaly.

DOWNLOAD THE FULL ARTICLE